Ether1 (proposal)

With reference to Gödel's incompleteness theorem WIKIPEDIA

Several scientists claim that Gödel's incompleteness theorem proves any attempt to develop a TOE impossible. Stanley Jaki pointed out in his 1966 book The Relevance of Physics, that Gödel's theorem states that any non-trivial mathematical theory will be either incomplete or inconsistent and since any 'theory of everything' will certainly be a non-trivial mathematical theory, it must be either incomplete or inconsistent, thus dooming searches for a deterministic theory of everything in which all the parameters are defined internally and consistently.[6]. Freeman Dyson supports this view stating

“ Gödel’s theorem implies that pure mathematics is inexhaustible. No matter how many problems we solve, there will always be other problems that cannot be solved within the existing rules. … because of Gödel's theorem, physics is inexhaustible too. The laws of physics are a finite set of rules, and include the rules for doing mathematics, so that Gödel's theorem applies to them. „ —Freeman Dyson, NYRB, May 13, 2004 Stephen Hawking was originally a believer in the arrival at a Theory of Everything but through use of Gödel's Theorem concluded that one was not obtainable.

“ Some people will be very disappointed if there is not an ultimate theory, that can be formulated as a finite number of principles. I used to belong to that camp, but I have changed my mind. „ —Stephen Hawking, Gödel and the end of physics, July 20, 2002 The acceptance of this view is not universally held and has been argued against by Solomon Feferman[7]

But if we try to have a global and systemic vision rather than a pure mathematical view, we will see that the more fundamental is science the more simple and homogeneous it is.

That’s why in this website we are using :

• Induction rather than deduction
• Systemic rather than analytic approach
• Emergence approach

-----------------------------------------------------------

Now we have linked between electromagnetic waves and gravity with a simple springs structure that represents Ether. Let’s try to build a model.

The simple springs structure was a way to explain gravity but it’s certainly not the most simple shape that could give this result.

Recapitulating the quotes we have started with, we can now complete the references and can say that there exists one Ether:

• that agrees with the General theory of relativity (Einstein. 1920);
• that not only occupies all space between molecules, atoms, or electrons, but that it pervades all these particles (Lorentz.1906).
• and where electromagnetic waves are mechanical waves in the Ether (James Clerk Maxwell)

And where spherical standing waves (matter) compress a portion of the Ether which causes a pull through the Ether (gravity)

There may exist dozens of shapes agreeing with waves and gravity laws.

But if Ether1 is the theory of every thing, then it should be, homogeneous, simple, and then, the amount of possibilities is reduced

In a 2d view, the simplest possible structure that agrees with both waves and gravitational law is:

In a 3D view it’s Kepler conjecture sphere packing

Source: Wikipedia